| It used to be that an outdoor photographer worked with either Kodachrome or Ektachrome slide film. Kodachrome is sharp and lasts a hundred years, and the original ISO-12 type produced darn good colors. The later K25 was too red and K64 was too green; so for accurate colors, the choice became Ektachrome. After about 1965, it was much improved and named Ektachrome-X, and it looked really good when the E6 processing chemicals came out. It changed its name, without much change of its characteristics, to Ektachrome 64, and is still available as EPR. So that is what I used for the last thirty years with entirely satisfactory results. An occasional 81A filter to suppress the blue cast, a polarizing filter once in a while to reduce the haze, and the pictures came out just fine. Of course, the colors varied according to the prevailing light, as they should - nicely saturated under full sunshine, containing more shades of gray otherwise. |
![]() Occasional glances at pictures published by professional photographers in magazines, calendars and advertising brochures convinced me more and more over the years that these guys must have waited around for months to shoot these pictures with these unbelievable stunning colors as I never saw in my life, obviously under light as it appears once in a blue moon. Of course, an ordinary tourist who just rushes through this same area in a day or even a week has no chance whatsoever to snap the same sort of pictures. Okay, so be it, not necessarily the early bird, but the patient bird catches the worm, and all that. But still, funny, that they all seemed to get these fantastic colors all the time... |